“But
mom, they MADE me do it,” is one statement that many of us have uttered before.
Doing something forbidden by parents, then getting scolded for it is never fun,
even if you think you do not deserve the blame. This childhood example of peer pressure
can also be used to describe bigger events, like events in history. During the
Holocaust, Hitler forced many individuals to persecute, torture, and kill their
fellow man. This was all part of Hitler’s plan to create the “perfect race”
that he could rule over. This power-hungry tyrant’s goal is similar to
Macbeth’s goal in the play by William Shakespeare. Macbeth’s only concern is to
be king and have power, and he will do anything to attain this goal. In both of
these examples, Hitler and Macbeth forced others to carry out their merciless
plans, compromising their morals in return.
The soldiers during the Holocaust were forced
to do terrible acts, even against their right judgment. According to the article “Can You Learn
Anything From a Void?” by Adam Kirsch,
the Nazi soldiers would “…first
dehumanize them [the Jews], to see them as enemies or as statistics—or as a
problem requiring a final solution.” This thought was thrust upon them by
Hitler. This way of thinking is also present in Macbeth. Macbeth just saw King Duncan as an impediment to the
throne, and although he felt a little guilty at first, he still killed Duncan. In
Act III, Macbeth also has three murders attempt to kill Banquo and his son
Fleance. The murderers are successful at killing Banquo, but Fleance is able to
escape. Even though these men were ordered to kill and did not choose it
freely, they are still completely guilty of the murders. God made everyone with
the right to be free and make his or her own choices. The Nazis or murderers
could have refused to kill others, but they chose to go through with it anyway.
These men were under a lot of pressure, being ordered by high authority to do
something, but they knew their murderous acts were wrong.
It is stated in the article
that “Such men did not make the decisions in the Nazi empire, they only carried
them out; and if they had not obeyed their evil orders, someone else would have
obeyed them.” This statement is true in the fact that the Holocaust would have
still occurred even if some of the soldiers refused to kill. Even in Macbeth,
Macbeth would have found someone else to kill Banquo if the three men refused.
However in order to save their moral beings, the men should have done just
that. They should have refused. In order for one human to kill another, their
moral convictions must be compromised in some way. Depending on the situation
and conditions, like in the Holocaust, one’s beliefs could be clouded by what
is going on around them. This is still no excuse though. An individual’s
convictions may not be strong enough to begin with if they resort to killing
other humans. The only way to combat the evil and maintain morals is to do away
with the evil and temptation, no matter the cost. Macbeth and Hitler are also
at fault for ordering the murders. Their consciences are not clear just because
they did not physically kill the men themselves. In any situation, the
individual who comes up with the idea and the executioner of the idea are both
at fault.
Hi Mykaela,
ReplyDeleteNice response to the writing prompt. It is true that a lot of our adult-ish behaviors are expressed in prototype during childhood. The common excuse of children--that someone made them do something bad--can be seen as a more insidious phenomenon when used by adults in weightier matters. I liked how you directly quoted the article and connected it to our play in making your argument. I also appreciated your firm assertion that both the "orderer of" and "ordered to" in atrocities bear equal guilt. Good job.